Mesothelioma: Do asbestos and carbon nanotubes pose the same health risk?

1743-8977-6-16 1743-8977 Review Mesothelioma: Do asbestos and carbon nanotubes pose the same health risk? Jaurand F Marie-Claude jaurand@cephb.fr Renier Annie renier@cephb.fr Daubriac Julien daubriac@cephb.fr

INSERM, U674, Fondation Jean Dausset – CEPH, Paris, F-75010, France

Université Paris 7, Paris, F-75013, France

Particle and Fibre Toxicology 1743-8977 2009 6 1 16 http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/6/1/16 19523217 10.1186/1743-8977-6-16 28 2 2009 12 6 2009 12 6 2009 2009 Jaurand et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs), the product of new technology, may be used in a wide range of applications. Because they present similarities to asbestos fibres in terms of their shape and size, it is legitimate to raise the question of their safety for human health. Recent animal and cellular studies suggest that CNTs elicit tissue and cell responses similar to those observed with asbestos fibres, which increases concern about the adverse biological effects of CNTs. While asbestos fibres' mechanisms of action are not fully understood, sufficient results are available to develop hypotheses about the significant factors underlying their damaging effects. This review will summarize the current state of knowledge about the biological effects of CNTs and will discuss to what extent they present similarities to those of asbestos fibres. Finally, the characteristics of asbestos known to be associated with toxicity will be analyzed to address the possible impact of CNTs.

Introduction

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have unique chemical and physical characteristics as a result of their nanostructure. CNTs may be used in a wide range of applications, in fields as diverse as electronics and medicine 12. Due to their widespread use, it is important to determine the safety of CNTs for the protection of ecological systems and human health. Research to investigate the biological effects of CNTs is advancing today in order to foresee and prevent their potentially harmful effects. CNTs have fibre-like characteristics in terms of their elongated shape, dimensions and aspect ratio. As particles with at least one dimension of less than 100 nm, they correspond to High Aspect Ratio Nanoparticles (HARN) 3. In light of the health impact of mineral fibres, especially the fibrogenic and carcinogenic potency of asbestos fibres, and the health and socio-economical tragedies caused by unregulated asbestos utilization, the increasing development and uses of CNTs have triggered concern about their potential toxicity 45678.

In recent years, several publications have reported the effects of CNTs. Most studies have concerned animal and cell responses, focusing primarily on respiratory diseases, especially the inflammatory effects in the lung. However, while inhalation is one important probable route of contamination, it must be kept in mind that there are other relevant routes of exposure. A severe primary cancer, malignant mesothelioma (MM), has been closely linked to asbestos exposure 910. Epidemiological and animal studies have shown that asbestos fibres are not the only fibres to be associated with a risk of MM development. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a higher incidence of MM in populations exposed to asbestiform and non-asbestos fibres 11121314. Some manmade vitreous fibres have caused MM in animal experiments 15. The question of whether CNTs might potentially be linked to MM development justifies further research in this area. Moreover, on the basis of the literature, CNTs have already shown effects in animals and in cell systems that are similar to those observed with asbestos fibres 1257. Two recent studies showed the occurrence of MM in genetically-modified cancer-sensitized mice and in conventional Fischer 344 rats exposed to CNTs by intraperitoneal or intrascrotal administration respectively 1617. These initial results underline the urgent need for information to further our knowledge about CNTs' potential to cause MM.

MM is a primary tumour of the serosas caused by the neoplastic transformation of mesothelial cells. In populations exposed to asbestos fibres, MM mainly occurs in the pleura, and to a lesser extent in the peritoneum and pericardium. MM is considered to be highly specific to asbestos exposure, and is found in from 60% to over 80% of cases 181920212223. In France, the calculated risk of MM attributable to occupational asbestos exposure was estimated at 83.2% (95% CI 76.8 to 89.6) in men, and 38.4% (95% CI 26.8 to 50.0) in women 24. Many studies carried out to investigate pleural and mesothelial cell response to asbestos fibres have made it possible to reach sound hypotheses about the mechanism of action of asbestos fibres in neoplastic mesothelial cell transformation.

The aim of the present review is to explore whether our knowledge of the mechanism of action of asbestos fibres could offer a useful paradigm to provide a warning or predict the risk of CNTs, to interpret data on animal and cellular responses, and to evaluate their potential health effects. For the purposes of our discussion, we consider three points: (i) the fate of asbestos fibres following exposure; (ii) their effects on mesothelial cells and the biological mechanism associated with the cell response; (iii) the nature of the fibre parameters involved in the harmful effects, and their similarities with CNT characteristics. We begin with a summary of current knowledge on the toxicology of CNTs, then look at asbestos fibres' mechanisms of action, focusing on carcinogenic effects at the pleural level. Finally, we address the similarities between asbestos and CNTs.

Toxicology of CNTs

Context of toxicological studies on CNT

Various kinds of CNTS have been the focus of toxicological studies. CNTs are heterogeneous in terms of their structure, impurities and physico-chemical properties. Both single-walled (SWCNTs) and multi-walled (MWCNTs) CNTs have been examined in toxicological studies, including commercial and laboratory-made CNTs, whether purified or used as produced. The effects of CNTs have been investigated following in vivo exposure of rodents, and on several types of cells in culture. Most studies concerned pulmonary toxicity 125. Animal experiments mainly focused on inflammatory responses after exposure by intratracheal instillation or aspiration, or intraperitoneal injection. In vitro cell systems with several types of mammalian cells have been used to study inflammatory responses and genotoxicity. A few in vivo and in vitro studies were related to dermal toxicity, and some in vitro studies focused on neurons 2. Toxicity test systems on procaryotes were also used to assess genotoxicity. Here our focus will be on respiratory effects.

Biological effects of CNTs

Translocation

Biodistribution of CNTs after deposition in the lung or via other routes has been poorly investigated. A translocation of SWCNTs in various organs has been reported by several authors 2526272829. In a recent study, MWCNTs deposited by intratracheal instillation in rats revealed clearance due to macrophage uptake and the lymphatic system without evidence of crossing the pulmonary barrier, six months after instillation 29. It can be noted that macrophage and lymphatic clearance was also demonstrated following administration or exposure to asbestos fibres 30313233. Erdely et al. 30 suggest that the release of soluble inflammatory factors could circulate to the vascular blood compartment after lung deposition of CNTs. The release of circulating factors must be taken into consideration to account for fibre effects. While asbestos fibres have been detected in the pleura, soluble molecules could also account for the pleural response 34, and genotoxicity may be due to clastogenic factors 3536. Additional studies are needed to determine the pharmacokinetics of CNTs. Regarding the numerous varieties of CNTs associated with a broad scale of physical and physico-chemical properties, fundamental studies will be necessary to establish the parameters leading the translocation process.

Biological effects on mesothelial cells

In vivo effects on mesothelial cells

Six recently-published studies concerned CNTs' effects on mesothelial cells. Three reported findings from animal experiments and three from cell system studies. One animal experiment concerned the mesothelial cell inflammatory response and pathological changes after intra-peritoneal injection 37. The authors exposed C57Bl/6 mice to four samples of MWCNTs of different sizes and aggregation states. There was one sample of "short" MWCNTs (from NanoLab, Inc; mean diameter: 14.8 ± 0.5 nm; mean length: 1–5 μm); two samples of "long" MWCNTs (Long1, from Mitsui & Co.; mean diameter: 84.9 ± 1.9 nm; mean length: 40–50 μm [24% > 15 μm of length]; Long2 from Univ. Manchester; mean diameter: 165 ± 4.7 nm; mean length: 20–100 μm [84% > 15 μm of length]); and one sample of more tangled MWCNTs (from NanoLab, Inc.; mean diameter: 10.4 ± 0.3 nm; mean length: 5–20 μm), as well as carbon black. At the same time, two samples of amosite fibres were tested; these were short fibres (4.5% > 15 μm of length) and long fibres (50.4% > 15 μm of length) known to be differently pathogenic in rodents. In prior experiments, inhalation and intraperitoneal exposure in rats to long amosite fibres revealed greater pathogenicity than short fibres in terms of fibrosis and cancer 3839. In the study reported by Poland et al. 37, inflammation was assessed after injection of 50 μg of MWCNTs/mouse, after 24 h and seven days. The end points were quantification of inflammation in peritoneal lavage and histology of diaphragm. Only long samples of MWCNTs and of amosite produced inflammation and granulomas. Histological analyses revealed the occurrence of "frustrated phagocytosis" by macrophages. These results thus demonstrated some similarities between the responses to the long forms of amosite and MWCNTs. Several of the effects of asbestos were also found with CNTs. There were higher inflammatory responses with samples of long fibres. Only the samples that contained long fibres caused granulomas and "frustrated phagocytosis".

A long-term study was performed by Takagi et al. 17 who inoculated MWCNTs (MWCNTs-7 from Mitsui; diameter: 100 nm; length: 27% > 5 μm) in the peritoneal cavity of C57Bl/6 p53^+/-mice. Because these mice have a mutation in one allele of the Trp53 gene, they are prone to develop cancer. Crocidolite fibres were inoculated as positive control. Mesotheliomas were found after exposure to both MWCNTs and crocidolite. This study has been discussed on several points, including concern about the type of mice, inappropriate exposure methods, high exposure dose, underestimation of the number of particles of MWCNTs and poorly-illustrated histology 4041. Details can be found in the different papers but some of the authors' replies can be summarized here. It is recognized that Trp53^+/-mice are more prone to develop cancers, and that the response using high doses by the intraperitoneal route of exposure provides different information regarding hazard potency. However, spontaneous excess of mesotheliomas has not been reported in this type of mice, and the injection method is applicable to the hazard approach for mesothelial cells in the absence of human data. Concerning the dose, the authors mentioned that other experiments using lower doses are in progress, giving similar responses 40. More recently, MWCNTs-7 were administered by a single intrascrotal injection in 7 Fischer 344 rats (240 μg/rat) maintained for an observation period of 52 weeks 16. Dimensions were 82% of the MWCNTs with a diameter between 70–110 nm, and 72.5% between 1–4 μm in length. Five vehicle-treated controls and 7 UICC crocidolite-treated rats (470 μg/rat) were also studied. The overall incidence of mesotheliomas was 86% in MWCNT-treated rats while no mesothelioma was found in vehicle- or crocidolite-treated rats. This method of exposure of mesothelial cells is not usually used to assess a carcinogenic potency of fibres. However, injury at the scrotal mesothelium is used as a method to investigate the repair mechanism of peritoneal mesothelium 4243. Further data are clearly needed to improve our knowledge of the effects of these MWCNTs on mesothelial cells in vivo.

Effects on mesothelial cells in vitro

To the best of our knowledge, four studies have reported in vitro effects on mesothelial cells. DNA breakage and DNA repair were found in both human normal and malignant mesothelial cells exposed to SWCNTs, as well as cell activation via AP-1, NF-κB and Akt 44. Another study concluded that there was alteration of cell viability and decreased cell proliferation in human mesothelioma cells exposed to SWCNTs 45. Three studies reported cytotoxicity on human normal mesothelial cells, malignant mesothelioma cell line, and on largeTSV40-transformed mesothelial cells (Met-5A) 444647. It is noteworthy that the same raw CNT material with different degrees of dispersion exerted different cytotoxicity on a human mesothelioma cell line 47. In this study, the toxicity of CNT-bundles (well-dispersed material with a bundle diameter of around 20 nm) was less than that of CNT-agglomerates (densely roped aggregates with a rope diameter in the micron-range). CNTs appear to be taken up by different cell types and diverse in vitro effects have been associated with CNTs uptake 245. However, the cellular uptake of CNTs is controversial. Both absence and significant uptake have been reported, as recently discussed 1. Uptake is likely dependent on interactions between cellular receptors and cell surface functions, and CNTs surface reactivity. A variety of cell surface functions may be found, depending on the cell type. CNTs may also carry diverse reactive groups. Different sorts of chemicals and biological molecules are currently used to disperse CNTs that may modify the CNTs surface. Hence cell-CNT interactions are dependent on a number of intrinsic and extrinsic parameters. It should be recalled that modification of the surface of asbestos fibres modulates the cell responses 4849505152. In macrophages, the scavenger receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO) seems to play an important role in pulmonary damage induced by inorganic particles 53 and may be involved in interaction between MWCNTs and plasma membrane of macrophages 54. In mesothelial cells, integrin receptors were reported to interact with asbestos fibres 5055. Recently, no particle internalisation was evidenced in largeTSV40-transformed mesothelial cells (MeT-5A) exposed to MWCNTs, despite cytotoxicity 46. Further studies are necessary to clarify these controversial results, as fibre internalisation is an important process accounting for the adverse cellular effects of particles, and more data are needed to determine the interactions of CNT with mesothelial cells.

Biological effects in other systems

Inflammation

Several studies have investigated the inflammatory response provoked by CNT exposure, conducted on mice or rats exposed via intratracheal instillation or inhalation. Several reviews may be consulted for more details 1245678. Some recent data are summarized in Table 13056575859.

Table 1

Summary of recent in vivo experiments carried out with CNTs

Type of CNT

System

Summary results

Reference

SWCNTs

(Carbon nanotech Inc. Tx).

Ø: 0.8–1.2 nm

L: 0.1–1 μm

Pharyngeal deposition in C57Bl/6 mice lung (40 μg/mouse). Observation 4 hours post exposure.

Gene expression in lung and blood: Upregulation of genes involved in inflammation, oxidative stress, coagulation, tissue remodeling. Increased percentage of polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN) in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).

SWCNTs.

240 nm (mode, aerodynamic diameter; in number)

Inhalation (4 days) in mice – 5 mg/m³

Short and mean term responses (1, 7, 28 days)

Lung analysis: Inflammation – Granulomas – Fibrosis – Mutation of K-ras

4.2 μm (mode, aerodynamic diameter; in mass)

Laryngeal deposition (10 μg/mouse).

Short and mean term responses (1, 7, 28 days)

Lung analysis: Inflammation – Granulomas – Fibrosis -

No mutation of K-ras. Lower effects compared to inhalation.

MWCNTs.

Ø: 40–60 nm

L:0.5–500 μm

Intratracheal deposition in rats.

One to 7 mg/kg. Short/mean term responses (1 to 90 days)

Inflammation; dose-dependent thickening of the alveolar lining

Particles still present after 3 months

MWCNTs grinded, unheated, heated to 600°C, 2400°C; 2400°C then grinded.

Ø: 20–50 nm

L: 0.7 ± 0.07 μm

Intratracheal deposition in rats, 2 mg/rat. Short-term response (3 days); mean-term (60 days)

Inflammation (3 days). Granulomas (60 days).

Effects of heated CNTs lower than unheated.

Grinding restored the effects.

MWCNTs.

Ø: 40–60 nm

L:0.5–500 μm

Intratracheal deposition in rats. One to 7 mg/kg. Short/mean term responses (1 to 90 days)

Inflammation; dose-dependent thickening of the alveolar lining

Particles still present after 3 months

MWCNTs

(Mitsui & Co., LDT)

Ø: ≅ 80 nm

L: 10–20 μm

Pharyngeal deposition in C57Bl/6 mice lung (40 μg/mouse). Observation 4 hours post exposure.

MWCNTs

Shenzhen nanotech

Ø: 500 nm;

L: 10 μm

Inhalation (≈ 32 mg/m³) in mice for 5, 10, 15 days; deposition ≈ 0.07, 0.14; 0.24 μg/mouse. Short-term response (8, 16, 24 days)

Small aggregates entering the alveolar wall

Cell proliferation and thickening of alveolar walls

Tracheal deposition: 50 μg/mouse

Eight and 16 days: clumps deposited on lining wall of bronchi, no inflammation – 24 days: inflammation.

Clumps in the alveoli destruction of alveolar structure

Regarding the large applications of CNTs and the known adverse effects of fine particulate matter, the potential effects of CNTs have also been investigated on systems other than respiratory 12. A recent study suggests that deposition of both SWCNTs and MWCNTs produce a systemic response, which may affect the cardiovascular system 30.

Genotoxicity

Both in vivo and in vitro effects of CNTs suggest a possible genotoxic effect, related to inflammatory responses and production of reactive oxygen species, as persistent inflammation is considered to increase the carcinogenic risk 60.

In vivo, a mutation of the K-ras oncogene was observed in mice exposed to SWCNTs by inhalation, and chromosomal aberrations were detected in type II pneumocytes after intratracheal deposition of MWCNTs in mice 5861. Several in vitro studies have reported a genotoxic potency using different cell types (Table 2) 4446545761626364656667686970. Activation of DNA repair processes and mutagenesis of the adenine phosphoribosyl transferase gene was found in mouse embryonic stem cells 69. Genotoxicity as assessed by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus test, was found in rat lung epithelial cells exposed to MWCNTs 57. Micronuclei formation occurred in human epithelial cells (MCF-7) treated with MWCNTs, and a pancentrometric probe analysis demonstrated both chromosome breakage and chromosome loss 61. DNA damage was also reported in SWCNT-treated mouse embryo fibroblasts and in CNT-treated bronchial epithelial BEAS 2B cells 6367. No mutation or DNA breakage was found in a FE1-Mutatrade markMouse lung epithelial cell line exposed to SWCNTs but purine oxidation was detected with the Comet assay 71.

Table 2

Summary of recent in vitro experiments carried out with CNTs

Type of CNT

System

Summary results

Reference

SWCNTs (HiPco), (CNI Inc.).

Ø: 0.4–1.2 nm

L: 1–3 μm

Lung hamster fibroblasts (V79)

Cytotoxicity (time and dose dependent)

DNA breakage (comet assay)

No significant enhancement of micronuclei

SWCNTs (50% SWCNT, about 40% other nanotubes).

Ø: 1.1 nm, L: 0.5–100 μm

BEAS 2B human bronchial epithelial cells

Dose-dependent decrease in cell viability. Dose-dependent DNA damage. No formation of micronuclei

SWCNTs (NIST)

Ø: 1.4 nm, L:2–5 μm

Normal human mesothelial cells and human mesothelioma cell line

Cell death. DNA lesions

Stress response activation

SWCNTs. Folate conjugated.

Ø: 1–3 nm, L: 100 – 200 nm

HepG2 cells (express folate receptor)

No toxicity if < 50 μg/ml. Dose-dependent apoptosis. Kinetics of SWCNT internalisation: Mb → cytoplasm → extracellular

SWCNTs (HiPco)

Human lung epithelial cells A549 and immortalised NHBE

Decreased inflammatory response in TNF alpha-stimulated cells

SWCNTs Mitsui & Co., Ltd

Size unspecified

Human aortic endothelial cells

Internalisation: CNTs identified in the cytoplasm. Cytotoxicity. IL-8 release. Actin filament and Ecadherin disruption. Reduced tubule formation.

SWCNTs

Mouse embryo fibroblasts

Low cytotoxicity. DNA damage (comet assay)

Oxidative stress

MWCNTs.

Ø: 67 nm

Mouse macrophages (J774.1).

No MAPKs activation; no apoptosis.

Interaction with membrane receptors (MARCO) and plasma membrane destruction

MWCNTs.

Ø:11.3 nm

L:0.7 μm

Human epithelial cells (MCF-7)

Chromosomal aberrations (micronuclei) showing chromosome breakage and loss of whole chromosomes

MWCNTs (C100, Arkema).

Ø: 12 nm,

L: 0.1–13 μm

Human epithelial (A549) and Large T SV40 transformed mesothelial (Met-5A) cells

Decrease in cell viability (mitochondrial alteration) without apoptosis. No oxidative stress. No MWCNT internalisation

MWCNTs grinded, unheated, heated to 600°C, 2400°C; 2400°C then grinded.

Ø: 20–50 nm; L: 0.7 ± 0.07 μm

Rat lung epithelial cells.

Chromosomal aberrations (micronuclei)

Lower effects with 2400°C sample in comparison to 600°C and unheated

MWCNTs.

Ø: 100–200 nm, L:a few μm

Human epithelial cells (A549)

DNA breakage (comets).

No oxidative DNA lesions

MWCNTs

(Tsinghua & Nananfeng, Cine)

Mouse embryonic cells (ES)

P53 activation. Induction of DNA repair.

Mutations (adenine phosphoribosyl transferase)

MWCNTs Mitsui & Co., Ltd

Size unspecified

Human aortic endothelial cells

Cytotoxicity. IL-8 release. Actin filament and Ecadherin disruption. Reduced tubule formation.

MWCNTs

Human pneumocytes A549

Decrease in cell viability

Internalisation

Investigations of the mutagenic potency of MWCNTs using bacterial test systems did not reveal mutagenic activity 7273. These bacterial assays may not be fully relevant to evaluate genotoxicity of particles. Previous results with bacterial cells were generally not or only moderately positive with asbestos fibres 74.

Asbestos fibres' mechanism of action

The asbestos legacy

Numerous publications on the mechanism of action of asbestos fibres have emphasized several responses associated with the mechanism of toxicity at the serosal level. They make it clear that two aspects must be considered: the biological response and the particle status. The first depends on several factors that include the fate of asbestos fibres following inhalation, i.e., their ability to reach the pleura. It is well know that deposition, clearance and translocation of fibres are dependent on biological mechanisms and partners (mucociliary transport, phagocytic cells), but also on fibre parameters, especially fibre dimensions. Short fibres are more easily internalised by macrophages than long fibres, and long fibres possibly involve "frustrated phagocytosis." The biopersistence of fibres is linked to both their dimensions and stability in the biological milieu.

Fate of asbestos fibres

Regarding industrial uses and commercial applications of asbestos fibres, the main risk of contamination is linked to the inhalation route. In general, particle deposition depends on aerodynamic considerations. Several authors have studied the mechanism of fibre deposition and retention in the lungs 75767778. Once deposited in the lung, asbestos fibres may be translocated into different organs and tissues, including the pleura. This was demonstrated in animals following inhalation or intratracheal deposition 79, and in humans by investigation of fibre retention in different body compartments including the pleura 808182. A recent paper discusses the translocation pathways of asbestos fibres to the pleura 83. Translocation appears to be due to trans-cell migration and lymphatic circulation. These authors propose that fibres deposited in the alveolar space can be translocated to the interstitium, down the gradient of physiological water absorption. This transfer is facilitated when the epithelial layer is damaged. Once in the interstitium, fibres can be distributed to different organs. Fibres can be cleared from the interstitium via the lymphatic system and enter the capillaries as inflammation increases the interstitial pressure, allowing the fibres to migrate and be distributed throughout the whole body. Therefore, fibres can reach the pleura via the capillary system and transfer through the visceral pleura. The parietal pleural has pores of relatively large diameter (about 150–200 nm), and the pleural fluid drainage goes through stomatas where particles are found to be concentrated.

Translocation of CNTs to the pleura can be assumed, as asbestos fibres are not the only particles to be translocated to this site. Migration was observed after inhalation of refractory ceramic fibres and NMVF10a fibreglass in hamsters and rats, and anthracotic areas ("black spots") containing particulate matter are present in human pleura 8184858687. One important point for the study of CNT toxicity is therefore to determine their ability to be distributed in the body and to reach the pleura. It is likely that the CNT aggregation state will modulate the rate of translocation. Recent experiments comparing inhalation and tracheal or pharyngeal deposition of CNTs concluded that the different effects were likely related to a difference in the dispersion and aggregation state of the CNTs 5859. It can also be assumed that the CNT pre-treatments used for particle dispersion will also influence the biodistribution of these particles. Moreover, it must be kept in mind that CNT exposure takes place via routes other than inhalation, which ought to be investigated.

Biological and genomic effects of asbestos fibres on mesothelial cells

Inflammation and mesothelial cell activation

Many authors have described the inflammatory processes occurring in the lung and in the pleura, and shown that fibres can interact with mesothelial cells in culture conditions. Fibre deposition in the lung is followed by the recruitment of inflammatory cells, which produce several factors: ROS (reactive oxygen species), RNS (reactive nitrogen species), clastogenic factors and cytokines that may stimulate and/or damage neighbouring mesothelial cells. Fibres also may produce ROS. Moreover, mesothelial cells respond by fibre internalisation according to a phagocytic process associated with oxidative reactions 34888990919293.

In this situation, mesothelial cells adapt to the oxidative environment by oxidative stress, increasing oxidant defences and decreasing natural ROS and RNS production. At the same time, several regulatory pathways are activated: signalling pathways (MAPKs) associated with cell proliferation and apoptosis, and DNA repair and control of cell cycle progression in response to DNA damage 9495. These different reactions are the consequence of 2 types of interactions: between cells (inflammatory cells/mesothelial cells) and between cells and fibres. As neoplastic transformation is linked to genetic damage and requires proliferation steps, comparison between the genotoxic effects of asbestos and CNTs might provide clues making it possible to develop hypotheses about the potential effects of CNTs.

Genotoxicity

Many investigations have focused on DNA damage provoked by asbestos fibres in mesothelial cells. Several studies have demonstrated different types of DNA damage (DNA breakage, base oxidation), and perturbation of the mitotic process 9495, showing that base oxidation and DNA breakage (single strand and double strand breaks) were detected in asbestos-treated mesothelial cells 9596979899100. These may be due to ROS/RNS production and to the mesothelial cells' ability to phagocytise asbestos fibres. Fibre uptake does not abolish the mitotic process as some fibres are found in dividing mesothelial cells. Moreover, extensive chromosome damage was described. A list of chromosome abnormalities has been reported by different authors. Asbestos fibres produce structural chromosome alterations; significant enhancement of aneuploid cells, abnormal anaphases and telophases 101102103104105. Induction of micronuclei by all types of asbestos in primary cultures of human mesothelial cells has been reported by Poser et al. 106. Other studies have shown genomic alterations in asbestos-treated human mesothelial cells. Loss of heterozygosity was detected as asbestos-induced mutations in a human mesothelioma cell line 107. Using 3D reconstruction, Cortez et al. recently reported mitotic abnormalities, centrosome amplification and aneuploid cell formation in lung carcinoma cells, even with long periods of recovery post-treatment 108. These findings are similar to earlier reports concerning rat pleural mesothelial cells and using less powerful methods.

Gene expression in asbestos-treated mesothelial cells

A few studies have investigated gene expression in asbestos-treated mesothelial cells using microarray analysis (Table 3) 109110111. They confirmed results obtained in studies focusing on given types of damages. Modulation of several biological processes were observed. They were associated with inflammatory, proliferation, DNA repair and cell adhesion pathways. Further studies comparing the cell response to CNTs and to the different types of asbestos fibres are likely to be informative in order to approach the possible effects of CNTs.

Table 3

Summary of in vitro experiments related to gene expression in crocidolite-treated mesothelial cells

System

Summary results

Reference

Human mesothelial cells (LP9/TERT-1) exposed to low and high concentrations (15 and 75 μm²/cm²per dish) for 8 or 24 h

Oligonucleotide microarray analysis

ATF3-dependent modulation of inflammatory cytokines and growth factor production

109

Human SV40-immortalized pleural mesothelial (MeT-5A) cells exposed to 1 μg/cm²dish for 1–48 h

Oligonucleotide microarray analysis

1 h: upregulation of nucleosome assembly, translational initiation, transcription, I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB cascade, survival

48 h: downregulation of cytoskeletal anchoring, transcription, survival

110

Normal rat pleural mesothelial cells exposed to 5 μg/cm²dish for 24 h

Oligonucleotide microarray analysis

Induction of fra-1-linked cd44 and c-met expression

111

Gene alterations in mesothelioma

Epidemiological studies have shown that MM is a consequence of asbestos exposure in a majority of cases 18192021222324. This led us to assume that genomic alterations found in MM could be linked to the effect of asbestos fibres. The identification of these changes can provide insight into the molecular mechanism of action of asbestos on mesothelial cells. MM cells exhibit frequent alterations in tumour suppressor genes found at the INK4 locus, and often the type of alteration is deletions. NF2 is another frequently inactivated tumour suppressor gene in MM cells. Germinal mutations in NF2 are responsible for type 2 neurofibromatosis, but NF2 patients are not prone to develop mesothelioma. TP53 is mutated less often in MM cells.

To investigate whether genetic alterations in mesothelioma might be relevant to the effect of asbestos fibres, animal models of human MM are developed. Mesotheliomas develop following exposure, by intraperitoneal injection, of hemizygous NF2 mice to asbestos fibres 112113. This made it possible to compare characteristics of mouse and human mesotheliomas.

Histologically, very similar tumours were observed, and the genomic alterations in the tumour suppressor genes investigated were very close to those observed in human MM. These gene are involved in the control of cell cycle and junction stability. Regarding the function of the gene, it might be of interest to determine the consequences of CNT exposure on cell cycle progression and cell architecture.

Asbestos fibre characteristics related to disease

If one looks at fibre parameters, several features appear to be shared by CNTs and asbestos fibres. To compare CNTs and asbestos fibres in relation to toxic potential, we should focus on the asbestos characteristics modulating asbestos toxicity. Shape, size, chemistry and surface reactivity are all related to cell and tissue responses to asbestos fibres.

Shape

CNTs have a thin and elongated shape compatible with a fibre, according to the WHO fibre definition of a particle with parallel edges and an aspect ratio (length/diameter) greater than three. It seems that CNTs are prone to form aggregates, ropes and clumps, a feature that is not fully similar to asbestos, which forms bundles of rather well-organized structures. The length of CNTs may vary, reaching up to several micrometers or longer 7114. Accordingly, "frustrated phagocytosis" was observed in cells engulfing long CNTs 37.

Size

The diameters of asbestos fibres fall in the nanosize range. If one refers to the dimensions of the UICC samples, which have been used in a number of animal and cell studies, the diameter of chrysotile fibres was less than about 100 nm, and 200 nm for crocidolite. Length depended on the sample, but generally averaged several micrometers. However, there was a significant range in length and a small percentage of fibres longer than 10 μm were generally present.

Chemistry

Metals are considered to be important elements to account for fibre toxicity. Iron content, either structural or as contaminant, may be linked to the formation of ROS and RNS. Depending on the method of production, CNTs may contain metals as contaminants; moreover, they can be functionalized to acquire specific properties. Data in the literature show a wide qualitative and quantitative diversity of metal contaminants in the chemical composition of CNT samples, emphasizing the importance of using well-defined samples for toxicological analyses 7.

Surface reactivity

Surface reactivity is an important parameter in asbestos-related effects. The production of ROS and RNS was mentioned above. It is interesting to note that some studies indicate that, in contrast to asbestos, CNTs quench ROS in an acellular system generating hydroxyl radicals 115. While asbestos fibres are hydrophilic, CNTs, unless functionalized, are hydrophobic. As a result, CNTs are often treated with dispersing agents prior to exposing cells or animals to CNTs suspended in aqueous medium.

Asbestos fibres' ability to adsorb biological molecules is another fibre parameter to take into consideration. Asbestos adsorbs proteins and phospholipids, which has consequences on cell-fibre interactions. An enhancement of biological effects can be observed (particle internalisation, cytotoxicity), as well as a reduction of toxicity 116117118119.

Asbestos bodies are structures found in the lung of asbestos-exposed subjects. They consist of an asbestos fibre core surrounded by a complex coat produced by the cell and tissue reaction; they are made of apatite mineralization and protein aggregation (hemosiderin, ferritin). These structures are more likely formed on amphiboles rather than on chrysotile. They are not specific to asbestos, as they have been reported in other fibrous and non-fibrous particles. It would be of interest to know whether these structures could be formed on CNTs 120121122.

Biopersistence

While biopersistence is not an intrinsic particle parameter, it has received attention for the evaluation of the carcinogenic potency of manmade vitreous fibres (MMVFs) 123124. Biopersistence in the lung is the result of a clearance mechanism and the behaviour of fibres in the biological medium. Clearance depends on particle uptake by scavenger cells; it is then modulated by the fibre size and toxicity (short particles are eliminated following uptake by macrophages; cytotoxic particles impair the process). The behaviour of the fibres is also size-dependent (fibre dimensions govern the mechanism and site of deposition in the lung), as well as dependent on the fibre structure and chemistry (these parameters modulate the stability of the particles in the biological medium). Some chemical elements may dissolve and reduce fibre strength, breaking the fibres into smaller fragments. Finally, biopersistence modulates the amount of fibre retained in the lung and the time it remains in the lung. To date, CNTs have been considered biopersistent, but further studies are needed to determine the relevance of this parameter in the context of human exposure to CNTs 57.

Discussion

CNTs are valuable industrial products with multiple applications in the field of nanotechnologies, yet legitimate concerns about their potential adverse effects on human health need to be addressed. The risk of MM, a primary pleural carcinoma linked to asbestos exposure, must be examined in light of the physical nature of CNTs, which are elongated and ultrafine, and the fact that human beings may be exposed to CNTs through inhalation. While not yet definitive, data are now available providing information on the pulmonary and cellular effects of CNTs, which may be compared to those of asbestos fibres. Moreover, the asbestos fibre characteristics involved in the toxic processes may be compared to those of CNTs to determine their similarities. These comparisons make it possible to develop hypotheses about common and different mechanisms of action. A summary of comparisons between CNTs and asbestos is provided in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4

Comparison between physical and chemical parameters of asbestos and CNTs

Parameter

Comparison

Shape

Both are elongated particles; fibre shaped.

Dimensions

Asbestos fibre diameter: range of 100 nm. Chrysotile fibrils: ≅ 50 nm of diameter. Same order as MWCNTs.

Structure

Chrysotile: multi-layered rolled sheets of brucite (MgOH₂) and silicon oxide (SiO₂). Important aggregation with CNTs, which may form more entangled bundles, ropes, than asbestos.

Chemistry

Different chemistry. Possibility of metal impurities in both asbestos and CNTs.

Surface reactivity

Both show sorptive properties to biological molecules. ROS production: no definitive answer for CNTs.

Table 5

Comparison between biological effects of asbestos and CNTs

Cell/tissue response

Comparison

Particle uptake

Demonstrated with both types. Conflicting results with CNTs. Exocytosis found with CNTs, so far not investigated with asbestos.

Cytotoxicity

Both cytotoxic.

DNA damage, mutation, gene interaction

Found with both asbestos and CNTs.

Transfection

Gene transfer is with asbestos. CNT gene knockdown.

Biodistribution

Both types are cleared via the lymphatic system and found in different organs

Inflammation, granulomas, fibrosis

Found with both asbestos and CNTs. Both types show dependence of biological effects with fibre dimensions: bioactivity of long fibres.

Cancer

MM found with both asbestos and CNTs by peritoneal exposure.

A paradigm for the health effects of HARN has emerged from toxicology studies of industrial fibres, including asbestos. A recent report reviewed state-of-the-art knowledge of the toxicity of asbestos and HARN 3. This clearly suggest a community of toxicological features and concern between HARN of different origin and composition. The reader will find in this quoted review additional information on other HARN (nanowires, nanorods) and the proposal for a research strategy to determine the potential toxicity of HARN.

Shape, structure and chemistry

Both CNTs and asbestos particles share fibrous morphology, and their dimensions are in the same range. CNTs are manufactured in two main forms, SWCNTs and MWCNTs. A SWCNT is a single-layer graphene sheet rolled up in a cylindrical shape, whereas a MWCNT contains several layers 125. The structure of chrysotile presents similarities with MWCNT. CNT samples may have much higher length than asbestos fibrils and form clumps resulting in different presentation and tissue penetration. One role of CNT sample dispersion to modulate biological effects is suggested by the results reported from in vivo experiments studying inhalation and intratracheal deposition.

Biodistribution

Similarly to asbestos fibres, CNTs may be deposited and retained in the lung after inhalation. So far, there is no definitive data on their migration and long-term retention, and on their translocation to the pleura. Interaction with mesothelial cells is likely important to account for asbestos pathogenicity; however, distant effects after deposition in the lung have been reported. As already mentioned, CNTs are the subject of scientific interest for a large number of already mature or potential applications. One paradox is that biological studies with CNTs are designed to investigate both adverse (exposure to toxic dust) and beneficial (nanomedicine) effects. These different types of studies show that MWCNTs are concentrated in the lymph nodes after deposition in the lung, and that functionalized MWCNTs also accumulate in lymph nodes after subcutaneous injection 29126. CNT biodistribution has been studied following intraperitoneal or intravenous injection in mice. CNTs are distributed throughout the entire body and cleared via urine excretion. McDevitt et al. found an accumulation of labelled SWCNTs in the kidney, liver, spleen and, to a lesser extent, in bone 127. There is to date no reason to exclude the possibility of CNT translocation to the serosa.

In a recent paper, Hankin et al. 128 summarized the research required into the mechanism of translocation of nanoparticles across the respiratory epithelium, and the resulting possible effects in and beyond the lung. The authors provide recommendations to develop research on translocation and penetration of nanoparticles that take into consideration the parameters allowing a robust interpretation of the data.

The relationship between structure and biological effects

Based on our present knowledge, a comparison between cell responses to SWCNTs and MWCNTs cannot be established. This is partly due to the limited number of investigations carried out with both types of nanotubes in the same assays. Nevertheless, both types are able to induce biological responses in one or several cell types, and in the lung. While studying the biodistribution of MWCNTs following intraperitoneal injection, Guo et al. compared different results obtained with both SWCNTs and MWCNTs 129. These authors suggest that toxic responses observed in the kidney in some studies may depend on whether CNTs are functionalized, a procedure that may improve the biocompatibility.

Surface functionalization, purity and treatment of CNTs appear to modulate the biological response, as found in different studies 115130131. The surface modifications of CNTs developed in the field of nanomedicine studies are of interest to learn about interactions between CNTs and cells or organelles. It is already known that surface changes influences cell responses. Viability of neuroblastoma cells was not affected by pure MWCNTs (99% purity). Viability and proliferation were reduced after acid treatment or when MWCNTs of lower purity were used (97%) 131. Acute pulmonary toxicity and genotoxicity of MWCNTs were reduced upon heating but restored upon grinding, in relation with surface defects57

Studies carried out with asbestos have demonstrated that long and thin fibres are more toxic than short fibres, without excluding potential toxicity for short fibres. Limits of 4 μm or 8 μm in length have been proposed, mainly based on in vivo experiments. CNTs can fulfil these length criteria, and similarly to asbestos, long CNTs were more active than short CNTs 37. More data on size-dependent biological effects of CNTs will be of great interest.

Surface reactivity of asbestos fibres has been largely advanced as a key parameter accounting for their toxicity in terms of ROS production and sorptive abilities. ROS production is associated with cytotoxicity, cell activation, and chromosome and DNA damage. Conflicting data are found with CNTs, as both production and scavenging of ROS were described. CNTs are a large family regarding their method of generation, treatment and functionalization. Hence the surface reactivity of CNTs towards biological systems will be largely dependent on the type of nanotubes. This may be maximized by treatments to disperse CNTs prior to use for biological studies. Different CNTs samples may have more heterogeneous surface activities than asbestos.

Biological effects

Available data in the literature concerning the effects of CNTs on mesothelial cells remain limited. Several effects of asbestos fibres, especially genetic damage, are related to fibre internalisation. While asbestos fibres are clearly internalized by mesothelial cells, there is no definitive data on CNT uptake by these cells. The physico-chemical properties of CNTs are likely to take into consideration in the occurrence of this physiological process.

Animals and cell systems exposed to CNTs appear to develop several responses similar to those observed with asbestos. There is some evidence that CNTs produce inflammation and mesothelioma when inoculated in the peritoneal cavity of mice. This result is consistent with inflammatory potency after inhalation or intratracheal instillation. Several CNT-exposed mammalian cells respond in culture conditions by inflammatory reactions and oxidative stress. Genotoxic potency has been reported in different cell types, including mesothelial cells, as well as in studies conducted in vivo. Hence CNTs used in experimental systems fulfil several criteria to elicit tissue injury, including the mesothelium.

Conclusion

The link between asbestos effects and mesothelioma has been attributed to several mechanisms. This link has been investigated using different animal models and cell types, and substantial similarities exist in the responses of the different cell types. Several fibre properties have been linked to adverse effects. Shape, dimension and surface reactivity are all important parameters. Reactive species may produce DNA lesions (base oxidation, breaks); their origin is related both to fibre surface reactivity and phagocytosis. Inflammation contributes to the production of ROS/RNS. Chromosome damage appears to be of major importance to account for the significant effects of asbestos. Gene deletions and recombinations might result from these effects. Integrity of some cell processes may be critical in the response to asbestos: dynamics of the cell membrane (fibre uptake, cell division) and control of cell division (check points, chromosome segregation processes, repair of DNA breakage, cytokinesis). In view of findings of a much less hazard of short than some long/non-biopersistent HARN, more information is needed on the CNTs' characteristics and conditions to which we may be exposed. Based on available data in the literature and knowledge of the mechanisms of action of asbestos fibres, it appears that CNTs may elicit responses that are similar to those caused by asbestos fibres.

In this review, for the sake of brevity, CNTs have been considered as a single entity. However, there is a large degree of heterogeneity within the CNT family. The legacy of our knowledge on the mechanism of action of asbestos prompts us to recognize some similarities between these two types of particles. Nevertheless, in view of the diverse uses of CNTs, toxicological studies should be carried out in the context of the respective applications, taking into consideration the possible interactions between the target tissue and the nanotubes, and their possible biodistribution. An evaluation of the conditions and type of exposure to CNTs thus appears mandatory to focus clearly on the safety and health issues. Exposure by inhalation for aerosolized CNTs must take into consideration both lung and pleural diseases.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MCJ contributed to the design and drafting of the manuscript. AR participated in the acquisition of data on asbestos on mesothelial cells and the genetics of mesothelioma cells. JD analysed the data in the literature on gene expression.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Audrey Saint-Albin for her help in editing the manuscript.

Mechanisms of pulmonary toxicity and medical applications of carbon nanotubes: Two faces of janus? Shvedova AA Kisin ER Porter D Schulte P Kagan VE Fadeel B Castranova V Pharmacol Ther 2009 121 192 204 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.10.009 19103221 Reviewing the environmental and human health knowledge base of carbon nanotubes Helland A Wick P Koehler A Schmid K Som C Environ Health Perspect 2007 115 1125 1131 1940104 17687437 An outline scoping study to determine whether high aspect ratio nanoparticles (harn) should raise the same concerns as do asbestos fibres Tran CL Hankin SM Ross B Aitken RJ Jones AD Donaldson K Stone V Trantra R Report on project CB0406 2008 http://www.safenano.org/Uploads/HARN.pdf Nanotechnology safety concerns revisited Stern ST McNeil SE Toxicol Sci 2008 101 4 21 10.1093/toxsci/kfm169 17602205 Toxicity studies of carbon nanotubes Kolosnjaj J Szwarc H Moussa F Adv Exp Med Biol 2007 620 181 204 18217344 Potential uses of carbon nanotubes in the medical field: How worried should patients be? Boczkowski J Lanone S Nanomed 2007 2 407 410 10.2217/17435889.2.4.407 17716127 Carbon nanotubes: A review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety Donaldson K Aitken R Tran L Stone V Duffin R Forrest G Alexander A Toxicol Sci 2006 92 5 22 10.1093/toxsci/kfj130 16484287 Nanomaterials and lung toxicity: Interactions with airways cells and relevance for occupational health risk assessment Bergamaschi E Bussolati O Magrini A Bottini M Migliore L Bellucci S Iavicoli I Bergamaschi A Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2006 19 3 10 17291399 Malignant mesothelioma: Global incidence and relationship with asbestos Bianchi C Bianchi T Ind Health 2007 45 379 387 10.2486/indhealth.45.379 17634686 Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the north western cape province Wagner JC Sleggs CA Marchand P Br J Ind Med 1960 17 260 271 1038078 13782506 Environmental exposure to libby asbestos and mesotheliomas Whitehouse AC Black CB Heppe MS Ruckdeschel J Levin SM Am J Ind Med 2008 51 877 880 10.1002/ajim.20620 18651576 Mesothelioma due to environmental exposure to erionite in turkey Dikensoy O Curr Opin Pulm Med 2008 14 322 325 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3282fcea65 18520266 Pleural mesothelioma cases in biancavilla are related to a new fluoro-edenite fibrous amphibole Comba P Gianfagna A Paoletti L Arch Environ Health 2003 58 229 232 10.3200/AEOH.58.4.229-232 14655903 Epidemiological and environmental evidence of the health effects of exposure to erionite fibres: A four-year study in the cappadocian region of turkey Baris I Simonato L Artvinli M Pooley F Saracci R Skidmore J Wagner C Int J Cancer 1987 39 10 17 10.1002/ijc.2910390104 3025107 Man-made mineral fibres IARC IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 2002 81 1 381 12458547 Induction of mesothelioma by a single intrascrotal administration of multi-wall carbon nanotube in intact male fischer 344 rats Sakamoto Y Nakae D Fukumori N Tayama K Maekawa A Imai K Hirose A Nishimura T Ohashi N Ogata A J Toxicol Sci 2009 34 65 76 10.2131/jts.34.65 19182436 Induction of mesothelioma in p53 +/- mouse by intraperitoneal application of multi-wall carbon nanotube Takagi A Hirose A Nishimura T Fukumori N Ogata A Ohashi N Kitajima S Kanno J J Toxicol Sci 2008 33 105 116 10.2131/jts.33.105 18303189 Asbestos and cancer: An overview of current trends in europe Albin M Magnani C Krstev S Rapiti E Shefer I Environ Health Perspect 1999 107 Suppl 2 289 298 1566265 10350513 10.2307/3434419 Cancer due to asbestos exposure Kishimoto T Chest 1992 101 58 63 10.1378/chest.101.1.58 1729111 Malignant pleural mesothelioma in parts of japan in relationship to asbestos exposure Kishimoto T Ozaki S Kato K Nishi H Genba K Ind Health 2004 42 435 439 10.2486/indhealth.42.435 15540627 Occupational exposure and regional variation of malignant mesothelioma in norway, 1970–79 Mowe G Gylseth B Am J Ind Med 1986 9 323 332 10.1002/ajim.4700090403 3706307 Asbestos-related occupational lung diseases in nsw, australia and potential exposure of the general population Park EK Hannaford-Turner KM Hyland RA Johnson AR Yates DH Ind Health 2008 46 535 540 10.2486/indhealth.46.535 19088405 An occupation-industry matrix analysis of mesothelioma cases in australia 1980–1985 Yeung P Rogers A Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2001 16 40 44 10.1080/104732201456113 11202027 The french national mesothelioma surveillance program Goldberg M Imbernon E Rolland P Gilg Soit Ilg A Saves M de Quillacq A Frenay C Chamming's S Arveux P Boutin C Launoy G Pairon JC Astoul P Galateau-Sallé F Brochard P Occup Environ Med 2006 63 390 395 2078115 16469823 10.1136/oem.2005.023200 Tumor targeting with antibody-functionalized, radiolabeled carbon nanotubes McDevitt MR Chattopadhyay D Kappel BJ Jaggi JS Schiffman SR Antczak C Njardarson JT Brentjens R Scheinberg DA J Nucl Med 2007 48 1180 1189 10.2967/jnumed.106.039131 17607040 Mammalian pharmacokinetics of carbon nanotubes using intrinsic near-infrared fluorescence Cherukuri P Gannon CJ Leeuw TK Schmidt HK Smalley RE Curley SA Weisman RB Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 18882 18886 1665645 17135351 10.1073/pnas.0609265103 Tissue biodistribution and blood clearance rates of intravenously administered carbon nanotube radiotracers Singh R Pantarotto D Lacerda L Pastorin G Klumpp C Prato M Bianco A Kostarelos K Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 3357 3362 1413890 16492781 10.1073/pnas.0509009103 Biodistribution of carbon single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice Wang H Wang J Deng X Sun H Shi Z Gu Z Liu Y Zhao Y J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2004 4 1019 1024 10.1166/jnn.2004.146 15656196 Biodistribution and clearance of instilled carbon nanotubes in rat lung Elgrabli D Floriani M Abella-Gallart S Meunier L Gamez C Delalain P Rogerieux F Boczkowski J Lacroix G Part Fibre Toxicol 2008 5 20 2645433 19068117 10.1186/1743-8977-5-20 Cross-talk between lung and systemic circulation during carbon nanotube respiratory exposure. Potential biomarkers Erdely A Hulderman T Salmen R Liston A Zeidler-Erdely PC Schwegler-Berry D Castranova V Koyama S Kim YA Endo M Simeonova PP Nano Lett 2009 9 36 43 10.1021/nl801828z 19049393 Size dependent lymphatic short term clearance of amosite fibers in the lung Oberdörster G Morrow PE Spurny K Ann Occup Hyg 1988 32 149 156 Pathways and quantification of insoluble particles in the lung compartments of the rat Trosic I Matausic-Pisl M Hors N Int J Hyg Environ Health 2000 203 39 43 10.1078/S1438-4639(04)70006-1 10956588 Asbestos content of lung tissue, lymph nodes, and pleural plaques from former shipyard workers Dodson RF Williams MG Corn CJ Brollo A Bianchi C Am Rev Respir Dis 1990 142 843 847 2171386 Kgf and hgf are growth factors for mesothelial cells in pleural lavage fluid after intratracheal asbestos Adamson IYR Bakowska J Exp Lung Res 2001 27 605 616 10.1080/019021401753181854 11597120 Evidence for 'bystander effects' in vivo Brooks AL Hum Exp Toxicol 2004 23 67 70 10.1191/0960327104ht419oa 15070062 Reactive oxygen species, chromosome mutation, and cancer – possible role of clastogenic factors in carcinogenesis Emerit I Free Rad Biol Med 1994 16 99 109 10.1016/0891-5849(94)90246-1 8300000 Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study Poland CA Duffin R Kinloch I Maynard A Wallace WA Seaton A Stone V Brown S Macnee W Donaldson K Nat Nanotechnol 2008 3 423 428 10.1038/nnano.2008.111 18654567 Inflammation generating potential of long and short fibre amosite asbestos samples Donaldson K Brown GM Brown DM Bolton RE Davis JM Br J Ind Med 1989 46 271 276 1009766 2540793 The pathogenicity of long versus short fibre samples of amosite asbestos administered to rats by inahlation and intraperitoneal injection Davis JM Addison J Boltob RE Donaldson K Jones AD Smith T Br J Exp Pathol. 1986 67 3 415 430 2872911 Re: Induction of mesothelioma in p53 +/- mouse by intraperitoneal application of multi-wall carbon nanotube Ichihara G Castranova V Tanioka A Miyazawa K J Toxicol Sci 2008 33 381 382 10.2131/jts.33.381 18670171 Re: Induction of mesothelioma in p53 +/- mouse by intraperitoneal application of multi-wall carbon nanotube Donaldson K Stone V Seaton A Tran L Aitken R Poland C J Toxicol Sci. 2008 33 3 385 10.2131/jts.33.385 18670173 Evidence for incorporation of free-floating mesothelial cells as a mechanism of serosal healing Foley-Comer AJ Herrick SE Al-Mishlab T Prele CM Laurent GJ Mutsaers SE J Cell Sci 2002 115 1383 1389 11896186 Mesothelial regeneration is not dependent on subserosal cells Mutsaers SE Whitaker D Papadimitriou JM J Pathol 2000 190 86 92 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200001)190:1<86::AID-PATH493>3.0.CO;2-G 10640997 Raw single-wall carbon nanotubes induce oxidative stress and activate mapks, ap-1, nf-kappab, and akt in normal and malignant human mesothelial cells Pacurari M Yin XJ Zhao J Ding M Leonard SS Schwegler-Berry D Ducatman BS Sbarra D Hoover MD Castranova V Vallyathan V Environ Health Perspect 2008 116 1211 1217 2535624 18795165 Single walled carbon nanotubes (swcnt) affect cell physiology and cell architecture Kaiser JP Wick P Manser P Spohn P Bruinink A J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008 19 1523 1527 10.1007/s10856-007-3296-y 17990080 Adverse effects of industrial multiwalled carbon nanotubes on human pulmonary cells Tabet L Bussy C Amara N Setyan A Grodet A Rossi MJ Pairon JC Boczkowski J Lanone S J Toxicol Environ Health A 2009 72 60 73 10.1080/15287390802476991 19034795 The degree and kind of agglomeration affect carbon nanotube cytotoxicity Wick P Manser P Limbach LK Dettlaff-Weglikowska U Krumeich F Roth S Stark WJ Bruinink A Toxicol Lett 2007 168 121 131 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.08.019 17169512 Vitronectin adsorption to chrysotile asbestos increases fiber phagocytosis and toxicity for mesothelial cells Wu J Liu W Koenig K Idell S Broaddus VC Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000 279 L916 L923 11053028 Superoxide anion release by alveolar macrophages exposed to respirable industrial fibres: Modifying effect of fibre opsonisation Donaldson K Hill IM Beswick PH Exp Toxicol Pathol 1995 47 229 231 8855115 Vitronectin enhances internalization of crocidolite asbestos by rabbit pleural mesothelial cells via the integrin avb5 Boylan AM Sanan DA Sheppard D Broaddus VC J Clin Invest 1995 96 1987 2001 185837 7560092 10.1172/JCI118246 In vitro genotoxicity studies of chrysotile asbestos fibers dispersed in simulated pulmonary surfactant Lu J Keane MJ Ong T Wallace WE Mutat Res 1994 320 253 259 10.1016/0165-1218(94)90078-7 7508551 Chemical and photoelectron spectrometry analysis of the adsorption of phospholipid model membranes and red blood cell membranes on to chrysotile fibres Jaurand MC Thomassin JH Baillif P Magne L Touray JC Bignon J Br J Ind Med 1980 37 169 174 1008685 6893551 Differential binding of inorganic particles to marco Thakur SA Hamilton R Jr Pikkarainen T Holian A Toxicol Sci 2009 107 238 246 10.1093/toxsci/kfn210 18836211 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes injure the plasma membrane of macrophages Hirano S Kanno S Furuyama A Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2008 232 244 251 10.1016/j.taap.2008.06.016 18655803 Role of alphavbeta5 integrin receptor in endocytosis of crocidolite and its effect on intracellular glutathione levels in human lung epithelial (a549) cells Pande P Mosleh TA Aust AE Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2006 210 70 77 10.1016/j.taap.2005.07.017 16169567 Toxicological effects of multi-wall carbon nanotubes in rats Liu A Sun K Yang J Zhao D J Nanopart Res 2008 10 1303 1307 10.1007/s11051-008-9369-0 Structural defects play a major role in the acute lung toxicity of multiwall carbon nanotubes: Toxicological aspects Muller J Huaux F Fonseca A Nagy JB Moreau N Delos M Raymundo-Pinero E Beguin F Kirsch-Volders M Fenoglio I Fubini B Lison D Chem Res Toxicol 2008 21 1698 1705 10.1021/tx800101p 18636756 Inhalation vs. Aspiration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in c57bl/6 mice: Inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and mutagenesis Shvedova AA Kisin E Murray AR Johnson VJ Gorelik O Arepalli S Hubbs AF Mercer RR Keohavong P Sussman N Jin J Yin J Stone S Chen BT Deye G Maynard A Castranova V Baron PA Kagan VE Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2008 295 L552 565 10.1152/ajplung.90287.2008 18658273 Comparative study of pathological lesions induced by multiwalled carbon nanotubes in lungs of mice by intratracheal instillation and inhalation Li JG Li WX Xu JY Cai XQ Liu RL Li YJ Zhao QF Li QN Environ Toxicol 2007 22 415 421 10.1002/tox.20270 17607736 Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress in human carcinogenesis Federico A Morgillo F Tuccillo C Ciardiello F Loguercio C Int J Cancer 2007 121 2381 2386 10.1002/ijc.23192 17893868 Clastogenic and aneugenic effects of multi-wall carbon nanotubes in epithelial cells Muller J Decordier I Hoet PH Lombaert N Thomassen L Huaux F Lison D Kirsch-Volders M Carcinogenesis 2008 29 427 433 10.1093/carcin/bgm243 18174261 Single-walled carbon nanotubes: Geno- and cytotoxic effects in lung fibroblast v79 cells Kisin ER Murray AR Keane MJ Shi XC Schwegler-Berry D Gorelik O Arepalli S Castranova V Wallace WE Kagan VE Shvedova AA J Toxicol Environ Health A 2007 70 2071 2079 10.1080/15287390701601251 18049996 Genotoxicity of nanomaterials: DNA damage and micronuclei induced by carbon nanotubes and graphite nanofibres in human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro Lindberg HK Falck GC Suhonen S Vippola M Vanhala E Catalan J Savolainen K Norppa H Toxicol Lett 2008 186 166 173 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.11.019 19114091 Intracellular uptake, trafficking and subcellular distribution of folate conjugated single walled carbon naotubes within living cells Kang B Yu D Chang S Chen D Dai Y Ding Y Nanotechnology 2008 19 375103 10.1088/0957-4484/19/37/375103 Swcnt suppress inflammatory mediator responses in human lung epithelium in vitro Herzog E Byrne HJ Casey A Davoren M Lenz AG Maier KL Duschl A Oostingh GJ Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2009 234 378 390 10.1016/j.taap.2008.10.015 19041333 Potential in vitro effects of carbon nanotubes on human aortic endothelial cells Walker VG Li Z Hulderman T Schwegler-Berry D Kashon ML Simeonova PP Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2009 236 319 328 10.1016/j.taap.2009.02.018 19268679 Comparative study of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity induced by four typical nanomaterials: The role of particle size, shape and composition Yang H Liu C Yang D Zhang H Xi Z J Appl Toxicol 2009 29 69 78 10.1002/jat.1385 18756589 Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: A comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes Karlsson HL Cronholm P Gustafsson J Moller L Chem Res Toxicol 2008 21 1726 1732 10.1021/tx800064j 18710264 DNA damage induced by multiwalled carbon nanotubes in mouse embryonic stem cells Zhu L Chang DW Dai L Hong Y Nano Lett 2007 7 3592 3597 10.1021/nl071303v 18044946 In vitro investigation of oxide nanoparticle and carbon nanotube toxicity and intracellular accumulation in a549 human pneumocytes Simon-Deckers A Gouget B Mayne-L'hermite M Herlin-Boime N Reynaud C Carriere M Toxicology 2008 253 137 146 10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.007 18835419 Genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and reactive oxygen species induced by single-walled carbon nanotubes and c(60) fullerenes in the fe1-mutatrade markmouse lung epithelial cells Jacobsen NR Pojana G White P Moller P Cohn CA Korsholm KS Vogel U Marcomini A Loft S Wallin H Environ Mol Mutagen 2008 49 476 487 10.1002/em.20406 18618583 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes: Lack of mutagenic activity in the bacterial reverse mutation assay Di Sotto A Chiaretti M Carru GA Bellucci S Mazzanti G Toxicol Lett 2009 184 192 197 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.11.007 19063954 Studies on the in vitro genotoxicity of baytubes((r)), agglomerates of engineered multi-walled carbon-nanotubes (mwcnt) Wirnitzer U Herbold B Voetz M Ragot J Toxicol Lett 2008 186 160 165 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.11.024 19135509 Use of in-vitro genotoxicity and cell transformation assays to evaluate potential carcinogenicity of fibres Jaurand MC Mechanisms in fiber carcinogenesis Kane AB, Boffetta P, Sarracci R, Wilbourn JD 1996 55 72 Toxicokinetics and effects of fibrous and nonfibrous particles Oberdorster G Inhal Toxicol 2002 14 29 56 10.1080/089583701753338622 12122559 Deposition, retention and clearance of inhaled particles Lippmann M Yeates DB Albert RE Br J Ind Med. 1980 37 4 337 362 1008751 7004477 Deposition of inhaled asbestos and man-made mineral fibres in the respiratory tract Morgan A Ann Occup Hyg 1995 39 747 758 8526405 Studies on the deposition of inhaled fibrous material in the respiratory tract of the rat and its subsequent clearance using radioactive tracer techniques. Ii. Deposition of the uicc standard reference samples of asbestos Morgan I Evans JC Evans RJ Hounam RF Holmes A Doyle SG Environ Res 1975 10 196 207 10.1016/0013-9351(75)90083-3 1193032 Deposition and retention of inhaled fibres: Effects on incidence of lung cancer and mesothelioma Lippmann M Occup Environ Med 1994 51 793 798 1128118 7849861 10.1136/oem.51.12.793 Characterization of asbestos fibers in pleural tissue from 21 cases of mesothelioma Paoletti L Falchi M Batisti D Zappa M Chellini E Biancalani M Med Lav 1993 84 373 378 8114650 Black spots concentrate oncogenic asbestos fibers in the parietal pleura: Thoracoscopic and mineralogic study Boutin C Dumortier P Rey F Viallat JR Devuyst P Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 153 1 444 449 8542156 Retention of asbestos fibers in the human body Tossavainen A Karjalainen A Karhunen PJ Environ Health Perspect. 1994 102 Suppl 5 253 255 10.2307/3432098 7882945 1567294 Translocation pathways for inhaled asbestos fibers Miserocchi GA Sancini GA Mantegazza F Chiappino G Environ Health 2008 7 4 2265277 18218073 10.1186/1476-069X-7-4 Pleural dosimetry and pathobiological responses in rats and hamsters exposed subchronically to mmvf 10a fiberglass Bermudez E Mangum JB Moss OR Wong BA Everitt JI Toxicol Sci 2003 74 165 173 10.1093/toxsci/kfg092 12773778 Comparison of pulmonary and pleural responses of rats and hamsters to inhales refractory ceramic fibers Gelzleichter TR Bermudez E Mangum JB Wong BA Janszen DB Moss OR Everitt JI Toxicol Sciences 1999 49 93 101 10.1093/toxsci/49.1.93 Comparison of pleural responses of rats and hamsters to subchronic inhalation of refractory ceramic fibers Everitt JI Gelzleichter TR Bermudez E Mangum JB Wong BA Janszen DB Moss OR Environ Health Perspect 1997 105 Suppl 5 1209 1213 1470175 9400725 10.2307/3433534 'black spots' and hyaline pleural plaques on the parietal pleura of 150 urban necropsy cases Mitchev K Dumortier P De Vuyst P Am J Surg Pathol 2002 26 1198 1206 10.1097/00000478-200209000-00010 12218576 Diseases caused by asbestos: Mechanisms of injury and disease development Manning CB Vallyathan V Mossman BT Int Immunopharmacol 2002 2 191 200 10.1016/S1567-5769(01)00172-2 11811924 Enhanced generation of free radicals from phagocytes induced by mineral dusts Vallyathan V Mega JF Shi XL Dalal NS Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1992 6 404 413 1312851 Pleural cell biology in health and disease Antony VB Sahn SA Mossman BT Gail DB Kalica A Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 145 5 1236 1239 1586074 Mechanisms of mineral fibre carcinogenesis Kane AB Iarc sci Pub Kane AB, Boffetta P, Sarracci R, Wilbourn JD 1996 11 34 Multiple roles of oxidants in the pathogenesis of asbestos-induced diseases Shukla A Gulumian M Hei TK Kamp D Rahman Q Mossman BT Free Radic Biol Med 2003 34 1117 1129 10.1016/S0891-5849(03)00060-1 12706492 Biomarkers in risk assessment of asbestos exposure Bhattacharya K Dopp E Kakkar P Jaffery FN Schiffmann D Jaurand MC Rahman I Rahman Q Mutat Res 2005 579 6 21 16112146 Asbestos-induced pulmonary toxicity: Role of DNA damage and apoptosis Upadhyay D Kamp DW Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2003 228 650 659 12773695 Mechanisms of fiber-induced genotoxicity Jaurand MC Environ Health Perspect 1997 105 1073 1084 1470173 9400703 10.2307/3433512 DNA damage in bronchial epithelial and mesothelial cells with and without associated crocidolite asbestos fibers Nygren J Suhonen S Norppa H Linnainmaa K Environ Mol Mutagen 2004 44 477 482 10.1002/em.20066 15534864 Distinct spectrum of mutations induced by crocidolite asbestos: Clue for 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine-dependent mutagenesis in vivo Unfried K Schürkes C Abel J Cancer Res 2002 62 99 104 11782365 Effects of asbestos on initiation of DNA damage, induction of DNA-strand breaks, p53-expression and apoptosis in primary, sv40-transformed and malignant human mesothelial cells Burmeister B Schwerdtle T Poser I Hoffmann E Hartwig A Muller WU Rettenmeier AW Seemayer NH Dopp E Mutat Res 2004 558 81 92 15036122 Phagocytosis of crocidolite asbestos induces oxidative stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis in mesothelial cells Liu W Ernst JD Broaddus VC Am J Respir cell Mol Biol 2000 23 371 378 10970829 DNA breakage in asbestos-treated normal and transformed (tsv40) rat pleural mesothelial cells Levresse V Renier A Levy F Broaddus VC Jaurand MC Mutagenesis 2000 15 239 244 10.1093/mutage/15.3.239 10792017 Cytogenetic response to asbestos fibers in cultured human primary mesothelial cells from 10 different donors Pelin K Hirvonen A Taavitsainen M Linanainmaa K Mutat Res 1995 334 225 233 7885376 Asbestos-related malignant mesothelioma: Growth, cytology, tumorigenicity and consistent chromosome findings in cell lines from five patients Pelin-Enlund K Husgafvel-Pursiainen K Tammilehto Klockars M Jantunen K Gerwin BI Harris CC Tuomi T Vanhala E Mattson K Linnainmaa K Carcinogenesis 1990 11 673 681 10.1093/carcin/11.4.673 2323006 The interactions between asbestos fibers and metaphase chromosomes of rat pleural mesothelial cells in culture. A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study Wang NS Jaurand MC Magne L Kheuang L Pinchon MC Bignon J Am J Pathol 1987 126 343 349 1899582 3826298 Chromosomal changes induced by chrysotile fibres or benzo(3–4)pyrene in rat pleural mesothelial cells Jaurand MC Kheuang L Magne L Bignon J Mutat Res 1986 169 141 148 10.1016/0165-1218(86)90093-5 3005853 Asbestos-associated chromosomal changes in human mesothelial cells Lechner JF Tokiwa T LaVeck M Benedict WF Banks-Schlegel S Yeager H Barnerjee A Harris CC Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985 82 3884 3888 397893 2987952 10.1073/pnas.82.11.3884 Modulation of genotoxic effects in asbestos-exposed primary human mesothelial cells by radical scavengers, metal chelators and a glutathione precursor Poser I Rahman Q Lohani M Yadav S Becker HH Weiss DG Schiffmann D Dopp E Mutat Res 2004 559 19 27 15066570 Loss of heterozygosity in asbestos-induced mutations in a human mesothelioma cell line Both K Turner DR Henderson DW Environ Mol Mutagen. 1995 26 1 67 71 10.1002/em.2850260110 7641709 Chrysotile effects on human lung cell carcinoma in culture: 3-d reconstruction and DNA quantification by image analysis Cortez BA Machadosantelli GM BMC Cancer 2008 8 181 2464777 18588678 10.1186/1471-2407-8-181 Alterations in gene expression in human mesothelial cells correlate with mineral pathogenicity Shukla A Macpherson MB Hillegass J Ramos-Nino ME Alexeeva V Vacek PM Bond JP Pass HI Steele C Mossman BT Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008 41 1 114 123 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0146OC 19097984 Gene expression profiles in asbestos-exposed epithelial and mesothelial lung cell lines Nymark P Lindholm PM Korpela MV Lahti L Ruosaari S Kaski S Hollmen J Anttila S Kinnula VL Knuutila S BMC Genomics 2007 8 62 1821332 17331233 10.1186/1471-2164-8-62 Microarray analysis and rna silencing link fra-1 to cd44 and c-met expression in mesothelioma Ramos-Nino ME Scapoli L Martinelli M Land S Mossman BT Cancer Res 2003 63 3539 3545 12839939 A mouse model recapitulating molecular features of human mesothelioma Altomare DA Vaslet CA Skele KL De Rienzo A Devarajan K Jhanwar SC McClatchey AI Kane AB Testa JR Cancer Res 2005 65 8090 8095 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2312 16166281 Hemizygosity of n<it>f</it>2 is associated with increased susceptibility to asbestos-induced peritoneal tumours Fleury-Feith J Lecomte C Renier A Matrat M Kheuang L Abramowski V Levy F Janin A Giovannini M Jaurand MC Oncogene 2003 22 3799 3805 10.1038/sj.onc.1206593 12802287 Opportunities and challenges of carbon-based nanomaterials for cancer therapy Bianco A Kostarelos K Prato M Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2008 5 331 342 10.1517/17425247.5.3.331 18318654 Structural defects play a major role in the acute lung toxicity of multiwall carbon nanotubes: Physicochemical aspects Fenoglio I Greco G Tomatis M Muller J Raymundo-Pinero E Beguin F Fonseca A Nagy JB Lison D Fubini B Chem Res Toxicol 2008 21 1690 1697 10.1021/tx800100s 18636755 Modulation of biological processes by mineral fiber adsorption of macromolecules in vitro Chang MJ Joseph LB Stephens RE Hart RW J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 1990 10 89 93 1700100 Asbestos-stimulated tumor necrosis factor release from alveolar macrophages depends on fibre length and opsonization Donaldson K Li XY Dogra S Miller BG Brown GM J Pathol 1992 168 243 248 10.1002/path.1711680214 1334143 Modification of asbestos bioactivity for the alveolar macrophage by selective protein adsorption Scheule RK Holian A Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1990 2 441 448 2160255 Surface reactivity in the pathogenic response to particulates Fubini B Environ health Perspect 1997 105 1013 1020 1470126 9400693 10.2307/3433502 Analysis of the cores of ferruginous (asbestos) bodies from the general population. Ii. True asbestos bodies and pseudoasbestos bodies Churg A Warnock ML Green N Lab Invest 1979 40 31 38 762953 Erionite bodies and fibres in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (balf) of residents from tuzköy, cappadocia, turkey Dumortier P Coplü L Broucke I Emri S Selcuk T de Maertelaer V de Vuyst P Baris I Occup Environ Med 2001 58 261 266 1740123 11245743 10.1136/oem.58.4.261 Asbestos or ferruginous bodies Gaensler EA Addington WW N Engl J Med 1969 280 488 492 4884335 An introduction to the short-term toxicology of respirable industrial fibres Donaldson K Tran CL Mutat Res 2004 553 5 9 15288528 Determinants of the pathogenicity of man-made vitreous fibers (mmvf) Oberdorster G Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2000 73 Suppl S60 68 10.1007/PL00014628 10968563 Manufactured nanoparticles: An overview of their chemistry, interactions and potential environmental implications Ju-Nam Y Lead JR Sci Total Environ 2008 400 396 414 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.042 18715626 Pilot study of targeting magnetic carbon nanotubes to lymph nodes Yang F Hu J Yang D Long J Luo G Jin C Yu X Xu J Wang C Ni Q Fu D Nanomed 2009 4 317 330 10.2217/nnm.09.5 19331539 Pet imaging of soluble yttrium-86-labeled carbon nanotubes in mice McDevitt MR Chattopadhyay D Jaggi JS Finn RD Zanzonico PB Villa C Rey D Mendenhall J Batt CA Njardarson JT Scheinberg DA PLoS ONE 2007 2 9 e907 1975469 17878942 10.1371/journal.pone.0000907 Cell pen: A study to identify the physico-chemical factors controlling the capacity of nanoparticles to penetrate cells Hankin SM Tran CL Ross B Donaldson K Stone V Q C Project CBN047 2008 http://www.safenano.org/Admin/Uploads/CellPenCB0407.pdf Biodistribution of functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes in mice Guo J Zhang X Li Q Li W Nucl Med Biol 2007 34 579 583 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.03.003 17591558 Respiratory toxicity of multi-wall carbon nanotubes Muller J Huaux F Moreau N Misson P Heilier JF Delos M Arras M Fonseca A Nagy JB Lison D Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005 207 221 231 16129115 Influence of purity and surface oxidation on cytotoxicity of multi-wall carbon nanotubes with human neuroblastoma cells Vittorio O Raffa V Cuschieri A Nanomedicine 2009