Open Access Research

The structure of volcanic cristobalite in relation to its toxicity; relevance for the variable crystalline silica hazard

Claire J Horwell1*, Benedict J Williamson23, Ken Donaldson4, Jennifer S Le Blond35, David E Damby1 and Leon Bowen6

Author Affiliations

1 Institute of Hazard, Risk & Resilience, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs., South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK

2 Camborne School of Mines, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, TR10 9EZ, UK

3 Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK

4 The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh/MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK

5 Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9PX, UK

6 Durham GJ Russell Microscopy Facility, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2012, 9:44  doi:10.1186/1743-8977-9-44

Published: 19 November 2012

Abstract

Background

Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) continues to pose a risk to human health worldwide. Its variable toxicity depends on inherent characteristics and external factors which influence surface chemistry. Significant population exposure to RCS occurs during volcanic eruptions, where ashfall may cover hundreds of square km and exposure may last years. Occupational exposure also occurs through mining of volcanic deposits. The primary source of RCS from volcanoes is through collapse and fragmentation of lava domes within which cristobalite is mass produced. After 30 years of research, it is still not clear if volcanic ash is a chronic respiratory health hazard. Toxicological assays have shown that cristobalite-rich ash is less toxic than expected. We investigate the reasons for this by determining the physicochemical/structural characteristics which may modify the pathogenicity of volcanic RCS. Four theories are considered: 1) the reactivity of particle surfaces is reduced due to co-substitutions of Al and Na for Si in the cristobalite structure; 2) particles consist of aggregates of cristobalite and other phases, restricting the surface area of cristobalite available for reactions in the lung; 3) the cristobalite surface is occluded by an annealed rim; 4) dissolution of other volcanic particles affects the surfaces of RCS in the lung.

Methods

The composition of volcanic cristobalite crystals was quantified by electron microprobe and differences in composition assessed by Welch’s two sample t-test. Sections of dome-rock and ash particles were imaged by scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and elemental compositions of rims determined by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.

Results

Volcanic cristobalite contains up to 4 wt. % combined Al2O3 and Na2O. Most cristobalite-bearing ash particles contain adhered materials such as feldspar and glass. No annealed rims were observed.

Conclusions

The composition of volcanic cristobalite particles gives insight into previously-unconsidered inherent characteristics of silica mineralogy which may affect toxicity. The structural features identified may also influence the hazard of other environmentally and occupationally produced silica dusts. Current exposure regulations do not take into account the characteristics that might render the silica surface less harmful. Further research would facilitate refinement of the existing simple, mass-based silica standard by taking into account composition, allowing higher standards to be set in industries where the silica surface is modified.

Keywords:
Cristobalite; Volcano; Respiratory health; Crystalline silica; Volcanic ash; Soufrière Hills; Quartz; Variable hazards; Regulations